Stimulate not Obliterate
By Rhonda Green
December 10, 2009
I've got an idea. Instead of putting the sale of Ketchikan Public
Utilities Telephone Division up on the block again, voters could
vote to restructure the KPU Telephone organization.
We could start by removing Karl Amylon as the KPU Manager (retaining
his City Manager position) and hire someone who really understands
what it takes to operate a Telecom on a day to day basis to once
again make it a profitable entity. Don't sell it because you
don't understand it. Remember the days prior to the combination
of the KPU & City Manager positions (the money saving tactic
before he was awarded so many bonuses for doing a such a great
job)? Looking back wasn't the KPU Telephone division profitable
then? We actually had a Manager that came from a Telecommunications
background. One who understood what it took to create revenue
in his/her field. Why did we let that slip away? To save money,
or was there already a plan to part out the Telephone Division
with a quick sale? Hindsight being 20/20 I guess we have an answer.
If you wanted your company to prosper why would you hire a fast
food manager to oversee constructing a multi million dollar highway
project? Who in their right mind would do that?
I'm not saying that Mr. Amylon is a terrible Manager, far from
it. He is a very intelligent man. The thing that I question is
the reliance he placed on the Manager below him. The one whom
he looked to for day to day operations. How many times did Telephone
employees plead with Karl Amylon's office to take a look at what
was going on in the Telephone Division? Managerial reports looked
good? Maybe things weren't as they seemed? If you believe everything
you read in reports without understanding what it is you're reading,
how can you make informed decisions? Were there exaggerated claims
of what this new technology possessed? Unrealistic expectations
as to what this technology would bring us? Pie in the sky figures
of rate on return? No matter what the answers to these questions,
the end results are clear. The damage is done, cleanup on aisle
3. Stop the madness! More work, less revenue - what's next? Funny
you should ask.
Now Mr Amylon with recommendations from Van Abbott are lobbying
to the Council to cut permanent positions from the Telephone
Division Staff including a telephone apprentice with less than
4 months to complete his apprenticeship. A great guy, born and
raised in Ketchikan with plans to stay here. He is Telephone's
future, and the replacement for the retiring workforce. A woman
with 23 years with the City/KPU, Warehouse Assistant, widowed,
Mother and Grandmother, 51 year resident. The OSP Manager, married,
father of two, employed for the last 13 years. All productive
and hard working Employees.
Ask yourselves, why are they
suggesting layoffs when they've recently added several positions
and there is so much work to be done? My suggestion, if you need
the extra money, trim the fat, start by getting rid of the Contract
Engineers who they can do without! Yes, the people who live in
other states. Train the workers you have and let them do their
jobs. That's they were hired for. They have the aptitude to succeed!
Council member Marty West had a valid point (excerpt taken from
Daily News) "West questioned the need for three marketing
managers at KPU Telecommunications, when the division has chosen
to lay off an employee who installs the lines that the marketing
managers sell. She said that didn't make sense, because the division
would be decreasing its ability to follow through on what it's
advertising to potential customers." Brilliant! I m glad
someone on the Council is paying attention.
While we're at it, let' s take care of the City/KPU 90 temporary
employees. It's a known fact that the City/KPU relies heavily
on temporary labor. They are all excellent workers. Men and women
living in the City/Borough (not transient workers), some who
have been employed for close to 5 years. No health benefits,
no retirement -- disgusting. But look how much the City is saving
by not having to pay for benefits. What kind of a boost would
it be to our economy if these temporaries were full time employees?
Would it help them with qualifying for home loans, or car loans?
More spending locally? Let's stimulate the economy!
46 year resident of Ketchikan
Former KPU Telephone Employee
Received December 10, 2009
- Published December 10, 2009
Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:
Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
E-mail your letters
& opinions to email@example.com
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.
Stories In The News