Library location, benches
By Carol Christoffel
December 31, 2007
As a former resident of Ketchikan, I follow events from time
to time. I am frankly amazed at the possible location of the
library to one of the steepest and most inaccessible areas of
downtown. I also note, with some dismay, an INHOSPITABLE message
being sent with the removal of library benches at the bus stop.
I have noted that many people have defended the right of the
citizens, including the homeless, to rest while waiting for the
bus. What I have not noticed is any public response from elected
City Council to these concerns.
I think Ketchikan needs to be asking WHAT'S IN IT FOR YOU/WHAT'S
IN IT FOR ME questions of its city council. The first question
is who stands to profit from this (who owns the land up the hill)
and if this person is on the city council or has close relatives
and financial gain from it, they must immediately disclose it
and disqualify themselves from the issue. What becomes of the
current land location? (Let me guess, an undisclosed investor
group will add it into the Creek Street development?) Maybe I
am just being cynical but I have a sneaking suspicion that someone
stands to gain big time from locating the Library on top of that
hill and it won't be the average person.
Tho some have issues with the homeless"loitering" in
areas near the library, the removal of the benches also means
the area is not very handicapped, elderly or disabled friendly.
Is this the message Ketchikan wants to send? Then when you add
in the lack of public transport to the top of the hill and the
steep incline which makes pushing a wheel chair, walker, or cane
a bit difficult, it is amazing to me that ANYONE would consider
it! Certainly federal funding for public areas demands Handicapped
Accessibility. How does a sharp incline meet these requirements?
As for the homeless, a few years our late, great President Kennedy
declared "War On Poverty". Somehow we have moved towards
a "war on the Poor". All over America, low income
developments are replaced with pricey upscale condos etc. aimed
at the middle class and upper middle class. This process known
as "gentrification" is often seen as an "improvement"...
except for one thing. The low income housing seldom gets replaced
and the poor, most of whom are WORKING POOR. have a harder and
harder time making ends meet and finding a space to rent. Right
now, several years after Katrina, the New Orleans area has a
homeless population of nearly 12,000 people, most of whom are
WORKING, but can't make it on the low income and high rent.
In the Chicago area, long
a strong real estate market, countless American families have
lost their homes to foreclosure and are showing up at homeless
facilities in record numbers. For the most part these folks did
everything right but got caught in ever escalating banking schemes
with their mortgages. Right now you'd have to give houses away
as no one can afford to buy them.
About: "Former Ketchikan
Received December 30, 2007
- Published December 31, 2007
Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:
Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
E-mail your letters
& opinions to email@example.com
Your full name, city and state are required for publication.
Stories In The News