SitNews - Stories in the News - Ketchikan, Alaska

Viewpoints: Letters / Opinions

By Rebecca Knight


November 28, 2012
Wednesday PM

The Tonka Timber Sale Record of Decision, signed in March 2012, culminated a multi-million dollar, three-year planning effort on Lindenberg Peninsula, just a short skiff ride from Petersburg. The protected waters of Wrangell Narrows allow safe access for local subsistence deer hunters during our notorious fall weather. Regionwide, one of the greatest threats to deer hunters is from boating accidents.

And one of the greatest threats to deer populations is from loss of low-elevation winter habitat. Currently, deer populations are crashing on Lindenberg Peninsula, just as they did 40 years ago on Mitkof Island, which was closed to hunting for 17 years and even today still has the shortest deer season in Southeast. Recently, the Petersburg Fish and Game Advisory Committee voted to recommend a reduced deer season and bag limit on Lindenberg due to conservation concerns.

The Petersburg City Council, Kupreanof City Council, and residents of Lindenberg Peninsula outside of city limits have expressed their concerns for further impacts on winter deer habitat crucial to maintaining local availability of huntable populations of deer.

Seemingly to address these concerns, the Petersburg Ranger District (PRD) initiated “collaborative stewardship” workshops which they claimed would enable the public to have a say in restoration of deer and fish habitat. But only three, of thirty-eight culverts currently blocking fish passage and degrading fish habitat in the project area, are being repaired. Standard precommercial thinning is being termed, “wildlife habitat restoration” but such thinning is well known to have only temporary effects for providing forage.

It was recently discovered that the PRD prepared an extensive “Change Analysis” of the Tonka Timber Sale, adding impacts that were not in the EIS, and incorporated those changes in the Tonka Stewardship Contract without the public’s knowledge or comment. So, while the PRD was conducting collaborative stewardship workshops, key decisions had already been made but were not revealed to public collaborators who believed that their voices would matter.

These extensive changes to the Tonka Timber sale and stewardship contract decisions, outside of the public purview during collaborative Stewardship workshops, constitute a breach of good faith in the public process.

The 100 page, “Change Analysis” tripled the original size of the Tonka log sort yard, and added additional clear cutting on 113 more acres of crucial deer winter habitat. The USFS claims these extensive revisions were “minor deviations” to the Tonka Timber Sale.  

This discouraging evidence demonstrates clearly, the present era of “Collaboration and Stewardship” on the Petersburg Ranger District is not living up to agency promises.

The old adage, “Saying so, doesn’t make it so.” is as true today as it ever was.


Rebecca Knight
Petersburg, AK


Received November 27, 2012 - Published November 28, 2012





Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:

letter Webmail Your Opinion Letter to the Editor



Representations of fact and opinions in letters are solely those of the author.
The opinions of the author do not represent the opinions of Sitnews.


E-mail your letters & opinions to
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.

SitNews ©2012
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska