FINAL: Hate, Greed, and Fear
By Steven McLaren
November 01, 2006
I expect this may be the last time I enter an editorial related
to this topic. I believe I've made my position as clear as I
can in writing. However, I felt like I should focus on one last
issue related to this.
After all the baseless talk, ironically, Mr. Freedland uses this
tactic of FEAR to persuade us to believe in his words. He attempts
to prey on our good natures and put the FEAR OF GOD into us.
Making us think we re such bad people if we don t accept homosexual
s ACTIONS. He states, And yes, I believe we will be damned
not by what we tolerate but by how we respect our fellow human
being on this planet. God, if anything, is about love and understanding.
Those that distort his teachings to promote hate are misguided
Anyone who studies the Bible and scriptures knows of God's abhorrence
toward sexual sin. Though God would like us all to return to
Him, everyone WILL NOT return to Heaven or have the opportunity
to live with Him. God will always love the sinner, but will
never approve of nor accept the sin. If this were the case,
even the most evil homicidal maniacs could expect to go to
Heaven. Thank goodness for the Atonement of Jesus Christ, those
who repent of sin can be forgiven and still live again with God.
But, we must repent in order to receive the remission of the
sin. Though God loves everyone, it is sin and bad choices that
will keep some from entering God s presence.
Believe it or not, I still love people who choose to make some
of these terrible choices of which we ve discussed. [I even
think Ellen is funny. Ha-ha] However, that does not mean we
ever have to accept their choices. That doesn t mean they deserve
all the benefits and blessings of those who choose not to make
those bad choices.
People practicing in the sexual sins that I've mentioned, including
homosexuality, need help and love but never to say that what
they re doing is right. These are good people who are confused
and who have a problem. No matter how homosexuality is spun,
it is no different in reality than the other sexual sins that
I've mentioned. We can use the same rationalization to justify
why the sins of beastiality or plural marriage should be accepted
also within our society.
As I've tried to explain, if we EXPAND what defines marriage.
WE ARE ACCEPTING THEIR LIFESTYLES! This acceptance and the
philosophy we ve heard from Mr. Freedland and others in our country
will undoubtedly lead to further expansion of and acceptance
of other NOW LESS POPULAR sexual sins.
About: "I have been a resident of Ketchikan for about nine
years. I am active in the community and love Alaska."
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Send A Letter -------Read
E-mail the Editor at
Stories In The News