Vote No on KGB Prop 3: EMS
By Ed Fry
September 28, 2010
Dear North Tongass Residents:
Having had the privilege to serve as a Firefighter and Paramedic
for over 20 years and the honor to teach administrators how to
plan resource allocation and needs assessment, I do not support
Proposition 3 and will vote no.
In a letter submitted by Mr. Bylund, he does legitimize additional
concerns as the property is industrial. Soil sampling needs to
be done to test for the chemicals and spills that have occurred
in and around the building in question; I am sure it will be
interesting. The cost of the property is one item and is not
the only additional expenses that Chief Hull and the Fire Board
are trying to sell us on as there are additional expenses!
The point of contention that is raised is that 800K is only the
tip of the iceberg for the related costs as once it is purchased;
the fire department will obviously want to convert it not only
for a water shed, but also another Fire Station. In a declining
economy and population, it would be much more fiscally responsible
to build a couple of volume cisterns on each of the Fire Departments
respected properties eliminating the want to purchase the water
shed (and additional uses that have yet to be determined).
There are some misconceptions and half truths when discussion
involves the ISO Ratings and if it will make your insurance cheaper
with the additional water supply. Fact of the matter is that
it will not make your insurance cheaper here in the North Tongass
Fire District. The portion that Chief Hull is looking at is
part of the Fire Service grading system in hopes that the ISO
improves. The ISO survey is based on 3 areas:
1. 40% of this survey is based on the community s water supply.
This part of the survey focuses on whether the community has
sufficient water-supply for fire suppression beyond daily maximum
consumption. ISO surveys all components of the water supply system,
including pumps, storage, and filtration. To determine the rate
of flow the water mains provide, they observe fire-flow tests
at representative locations in the community.
2. 50% of the overall grading is based on the number of engine
companies and the amount of water a community needs to fight
3. 10% percent of the overall grading is based on how well the
fire department receives fire alarms and dispatches its firefighting
Meaning more cost in addition to 800K. The change in North Tongass
Fire Department ISO rating would, not change dramatically; I
believe that NTFD is 9 out of 10 (1 is the best).
In the costs related to the station AKA water shed, we will have
an $85 increase in fire service fee. There is no proposal for
additional service, just a lot more water to be used in the
surround and drown method of defensive firefighting in the district.
Remember that NTFD has a 65% loss rate on fires in the past 5
years. In my professional opinion this was not because of manpower
on scene or the lack of water, it is because of time lapse of
the call and ability to do interior firefighting should a rapid
and direct attack be possible. A small kitchen fire can quickly
engulf a house and an interior attack is not possible.
Again I will be voting no on the proposition as there is no fiscal
responsibility or structured needs assessment that has been done.
In my own professional assessment if Chief Hull wants more water,
then cistern the water on our fire station property, devote more
time to needs assessment for the community, begin a systemic
review of the current fire coding and tighten the codes in prevention
and enforcement, make grants available to the homeowner to update
or aid in the installation of a residential fire suppression
system, and stop adding additional debt in a financially stressed
Vote no on Proposition 3, the
About: "served as a Firefighter
and Paramedic for over 20 years and the honor to teach administrators
how to plan resource allocation and needs assessment"
Received September 22, 2010
- Published September 28, 2010
Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:
Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
E-mail your letters
& opinions to email@example.com
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.
Stories In The News