|  Viewpoints
      White Cliff Center Project
      -- Why White Cliff? By James A. Van Altvorst
 
 September 15, 2006Friday
 Suggestions that the Borough should destroy or sell White Cliff
      often cite worries about uncontrollable costs. Remodel projects
      carry certain risks; however, one can easily find many examples
      of successful remodeling projects. Juneau's Capital School renovation,
      a project similar in size and complexity, is just one. Clearly,
      risks inherent in renovation are manageable.
 
 Also, we must be cautious about assumptions that new buildings
      are free of errors or troubles. Design or specifications may
      not be quite right in spite of due diligence; construction can
      be less than perfect. In the end, new buildings rarely meet all
      expectations.
 
 Finally, we must recognize the fact that White Cliff is an existing
      and valuable community asset uniquely adaptable and suitably
      located to successfully serve as a combined center for senior
      and arts programs. With its rich heritage and deep connections
      to this community, it is a treasure worth keeping. Older structures,
      like White Cliff, hold and reflect our history. They are important
      because their very presence helps us remember our past and understand
      who we are today. We can ill-afford to demolish White Cliff -
      it is a precious link between our past and our future.
 
 To help ensure a successful project, the White Cliff Center Steering
      Committee contracted with architects and engineers experienced
      in historic structures to thoroughly evaluate White Cliff School.
      They concluded that White Cliff is sound and a good candidate
      for renovation. Through many meetings with potential users, they
      determined that White Cliff is well-suited for the community's
      senior services and arts programs. They carefully and conservatively
      evaluated the costs of renovation, including contingencies appropriate
      for a renovation project, and of long term maintenance and operation,
      concluding that these costs are comparable to new construction.
      Based upon all the work done to date, the proposed White Cliff
      Center renovation project appears feasible and practical. Renovating
      the White Cliff School will be a sound investment - a way to
      cherish our heritage and build a community for our future. Please
      vote "yes" on Ballot Propositions 1 and 2 on October
      3.
 
 Sincerely,
 James A. Van AltvorstKetchikan, AK - USA
 
 
 
 
 
 About: "Thirty-plus year resident of Ketchikan. At-large
      member of the White Cliff Center Steering Committee."
     On the Web: 
        Proposition 1 - Sales Tax Increase:
        For the full text of Ordinance No. 1403 click herehttp://borough.ketchikan.ak.us/clerks/documents/1403.pdf
 Proposition 2 - Bonds:  For
        the full text of Ordinance No. 1404 click here http://borough.ketchikan.ak.us/clerks/documents/1404.pdf
 White Cliff Projecthttp://www.ketchikanarts.org/whitecliff
 
  Note: Comments published
      on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
 
         
        Send A Letter -------Read
        Letters
        E-mail the Editor at
        editor@sitnews.us
        SitnewsStories In The News
 Ketchikan, Alaska
 |