|  Viewpoints
      The bridge is still a bad
      idea By Michael Spence
 August 26, 2007Sunday
 A bad idea promoted by a few highly motivated and perhaps even
      well intended people is ultimately still a bad idea.
 
 DOT commissioner Leo Von Sheben could not have made the point
      clearer, or to those who most need it clarified, at the recent
      Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce luncheon. The bridge to Gravina
      has never made any fiscal sense in any objective forum, anywhere.
 
 There is no tax base in Ketchikan to maintain the bridge, let
      alone to build it.  There are no private investors willing to
      carry or even share the burden.  The bridge is a concept based
      purely and totally on the empty promise that someone else's money
      was available to build it.   Its advocates were (are) banking
      on nothing more than future subsidies from federal, state and
      borough treasuries to support it  in the future.
 
 Worse yet, the bridge is a threat to its greatest commercial
      asset; its natural harbor.  The same harbor that allowed steamers
      to bring settlers here in the 19th century, cannery and log ships
      in the 20th century, and now the present day cruise ships.  None
      of these ships from any period would fit through the bridge contemplated
      over the East channel of Tongass Narrows.  Even if the largest
      vessels could access the port through the West channel crossing,
      it would force a needless constriction of both the waterways
      into one very narrow channel.  For what purpose?
 
 This very real threat against Ketchikans harbor is balanced against
      a bogus promise that Gravina Island has more land for development
      than Revillagigedo Island, on which Ketchikan already is built.
      Gravina Island is a fraction of the size of Revillagigedo.  Admittedly
      the roads we have on Revillagigedo  Island are poor, but they
      could be fixed and extended for a fraction of the cost of a bridge
      or the presently underway Gravina Highway project.
 
 It is time for Ketchikan's leadership to formulate a  better
      reasoned transportation plan that protects Ketchikans most valuable
      resources and stimulates private investment, not more subsidized
      industry.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Michael Spence
 Ketchikan, AK
 Received August 23, 2007 -
      Published August 26, 2007 About: " Ketchikan resident
      over 25 yrs, marine pilot in Southeast Alaska for 30 yrs." 
          Viewpoints - Opinion Letters: 
         Webmail
        Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
    Note: Comments published
      on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
       
      E-mail your letters
      & opinions to editor@sitnews.us
 Your full name, city and state are required for publication.
 
 
 
        SitNews
        ©2007Stories In The News
 Ketchikan, Alaska
 |