Some Thoughts on Consolidation
By Samuel Bergeron
August 13, 2006
The empirical weatherman looks out the window and sees what the
weather is doing. He doesn't look at forecasts, read about the
probabilities of rain or snow; he looks and sees with his own
eyes what the weather is doing.
When I consider consolidation of the communities two governments
I look to the nearby towns of Juneau and Sitka and see how they
are doing. The first thing I notice is that no one in Sitka or
Juneau is still yearning for the old system of two governments.
I haven't heard "If only our governments were still as two,
my life would be so much better". Maybe I missed that, but
I don't think so. So we're off to good start.
The next thing to consider is the ability to change policy that
could benefit all the resident of Ketchikan. Let's take sales
tax for instance. When we talk about sales tax we can all agree
that the current code is deficient in that it taxes food and
rent and lets some users of the economy off completely from paying
any sales tax. Now try to change that with two stand alone governments
like the City and the Borough. The first place that would go
is the joint sales tax committee that meets very infrequently
and has never been able to come to a consensus on anything. Let's
face it; these people don't like each other and they don't work
well together. The City feels like the Borough has wasted the
Disaster Relief money ($25,000,000.00) and continues to mismanage
their current affairs and the Borough dislikes the leadership
of the City immensely. How can we overcome that? We can't. We'll
always be stuck in this turf war between the City and the Borough
and that makes any substantive policy change nearly impossible.
When the Borough was formed and subsequent to that time, they
wound up with the operations that rely mostly on taxes to function:
parks and recreation, school facilities and school funding, planning
and zoning, etc. The City on the other hand has most all of the
revenue generating enterprises like KPU and Ports and Harbors.
These City run enterprises generate millions of dollars and have
accumulated huge budget reserves. The Borough has been forced
to cut staff, reduce school funding, operate in offices that
are substandard and drive old vehicles. The City, on the other
hand, accumulates millions of dollars in the name of reserves
and operates in relative opulence in comparison to their Borough
counterparts. As a resident of the City who pays taxes to both
governments, it makes me angry that we can't afford to educate
our children, but we can afford to add to the City's savings
account. I don't suppose that one government would preserve their
bank account at the cost of the education we provide to our kids,
but that is exactly what we are doing now with two governments.
Good policy is essential to good government. When we're unable
to change old, cumbersome and sometimes unethical policy to preserve
a turf war between the two governments we now have, I would say
for that reason alone, it's time to consolidate.
Ketchikan, AK - USA
About: "I'm voting in
the next election for change. I would encourage all of you to
do the same."
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Send A Letter -------Read Letters
E-mail the Editor
Stories In The News