By William Tatsuda
August 12, 2005
Now, do the math. North design costs 20.6% more, but has 20% less capacity. I am not a banker, but my guess is that the bonds could be paid off at least 40% faster if the Thomas Basin design is built instead. If the current bond proposal passes, the local tourist industry will be limited to 4 docks for 30 years, as opposed to being limited to 5 docks for 18 years. It will be hard for the City to get voter approval to bond for additional docks until the current bond proposal is paid off. The problem is that we need 5 docks now, and more as soon as possible.
The Thomas Basin design has plenty of parking and bus staging area and causes less of a traffic problem. It also blocks fewer water views.
The only ones benefiting from the North docks are the property owners on the waterside between Sockeye Sam's and Talbot's. Everyone else loses, including the tourist industry, cruise ship lines, and citizens of Ketchikan.
The objections from the cannery manager regarding the Thomas Basin T-Pier are vague and unsubstantiated. If Homeland Security were to be a problem for the cannery, it would be an even bigger problem for City Float under the current plan. There is plenty of room for boats to unload fish at the cannery. It is just an inconvenience for them to have to anchor their boats further away. The owner of the cannery property should have been involved rather than tuning it over to the cannery manager.
On the Web:
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.