Plaintiffs Say Forest Service Concealed Impacts to the "Islands Wolf" and Subsistence Deer Hunters
July 11, 2008
The four timber projects are: Scott Peak (Kupreanof Island, Petersburg Ranger District (RD)); Overlook (Mitkof Island, Petersburg RD); Traitors Cove (Revillagigedo (Revilla) Island, Ketchikan-Misty Fiords RD); and Soda Nick (Prince of Wales Island, Craig RD).
The plaintiffs are Greenpeace and Cascadia Wildlands Project, both of which have offices in Alaska. They say the Forest Service has violated bedrock environmental laws by deliberately ignoring their legitimate criticisms of how impacts to deer were assessed in the decision process and not providing a "full and fair discussion" of their concerns. While not a plaintiff in the suit, the Alaska Department of Fish & Game has repeatedly challenged these same flaws.
"The Forest Service has misapplied the science and has stonewalled all challenges," said Sitka-based Greenpeace forest campaigner Larry Edwards. "We have sought resolution for years. Now the courts are the only recourse."
To provide for wolves and hunters, a 1997 Tongass Forest Plan standard and guideline requires retaining a habitat-carrying capacity of 18 deer per square mile. According to information provided by the Sitka-based Cascadia Wildlands Project in a news release, there are two long-standing errors in how the Forest Service calculates deer carrying capacity. The Vol-Strata forest-characteristics data set that the agency uses is known to be uncorrelated to habitat quality, causing overestimation of carrying capacity. Second, a conversion factor (the "deer multiplier") has been misused for the estimates, alone causing a 30 percent overestimation. The combined error can be as much as an 120 percent overestimation of carrying capacity, and a consequent underestimation of the logging impacts to deer, wolves and hunters. Both the plaintiffs and the Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game have repeatedly asked the Forest Service to correct these errors according to the Cascadia Wildlands Project.
The lawsuit demands that the four logging projects be stopped and that supplemental analysis be ordered to fairly evaluate their impacts. Combined, the projects would take 33 million board feet of timber from 1,700 acres of old-growth forest and construct 9.5 miles of new, permanent logging roads.
"Ancient forest logging reduces the ability of the forest to sustain deer in winter," said Gabe Scott, Alaska field representative for Cascadia Wildlands Project in Cordova. "When old-growth forests are logged, deer become more vulnerable to population collapses during hard winters, and the Tongass has had recent record-setting snowfalls consistent with climate change factors for the region. Deer are a vital food source both for residents of the region and the Islands Wolf."
The Tongass, America's largest national forest, has been a flashpoint of controversy for decades. It is the world's largest remaining temperate rainforest that is still relatively intact. Even so, viability of Tongass wildlife species - the Islands Wolf prominent among them - is a well acknowledged concern according to information provided by Cascadia Wildlands Project. In 1997, the Forest Service avoided a 'threatened' listing of the Islands Wolf under the Endangered Species Act by including a protective standard in its then new Tongass Forest Plan. The standard was intended to protect both the wolf's "viability and wide distribution" and the needs of families that depend on deer for food on the table.
The Islands Wolf (Canis lupus ligoni, the Alexander Archipelago wolf) is a grey wolf subspecies endemic to the region, inhabiting all of the region except three large islands.
"The rule the Forest Service was forced to adopt is in the way of its ambition to expand the Tongass timber program," Edwards said. "We think it is no accident that the agency's deer habitat modeling errors all work in one direction - consistently overestimating habitat by as much as 120 percent and consequently underestimating logging impacts."
Chris Winter of the Crag Law Center in Portland, Oregon, is representing the plaintiffs in the case.
Sources of News:
Publish A Letter in SitNews Read Letters/Opinions