SitNews - Stories in the News - Ketchikan, Alaska

Viewpoints: Letters / Opinions

Bad Arguments for Taxing the PFD

By Ghert Abbott


June 20, 2018
Wednesday PM

A number of very bad arguments have been made by those who want to resolve our state’s fiscal crisis via a massive head tax on the Permanent Fund Dividend without any regard for the extremely regressive effects that this will have.

The most popular argument is that the PFD is merely being reduced to its historical average of $1,050. The purpose of this argument is to convince Alaskans that they won’t suffer too great a loss because they’ll still be getting an “average” PFD. But this average is simply the median between the highest and lowest returns. Making the median return the new high will naturally create a newer, lower average for PFD recipients. So for Alaskans to continue receiving an average PFD of $1,050, by definition the Permanent Fund needs to be left alone.

Another common argument is that the PFD has gone below $1,000 dollars in the past and recent PFDs have been historically high. The clear implication of this argument is that Alaskans are spoiled for expecting anything greater than $1,000. This reasoning is absurd. Consider the following hypothetical: if the PFD was well below its historical average by several hundred dollars, would the legislature allocate state funds to return the PFD to its historical norm? No, of course not. But it is somehow acceptable to advocate that the state is justified in reducing/taxing any PFD that is above $1,000. So a below average PFD is a misfortune you simply have to accept, but an above average PFD is an extravagance the state government is justified in confiscating.

Finally there’s the argument that current reductions to the PFD are necessary in order to stabilize the Permanent Fund. This ignores the fact that there only needs to be a stabilization because the state government is tapping the Earnings Reserve, as opposed to raising its own revenue. But the legislature has been warned by the Permanent Fund Corporation that the current 5.25% draw has a roughly 50% chance of permanently reducing the value of the Fund by making it unable to keep pace with inflation. How very stable.

Ghert Abbott
Ketchikan, Alaska

About: Ghert Abbott was born in Ketchikan in 1986 and is a graduate of Ketchikan High School and the University of Alaska Southeast-Ketchikan. He is the Democratic candidate for House District 36’s legislative seat.


Editor's Note:

The text of this letter was NOT edited by the SitNews Editor.


Received June 17, 2018 - Published June 20, 2018

Related Viewpoint:



Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:

Webmail Your Opinion Letter to the Editor


Representations of fact and opinions in letters are solely those of the author.
The opinions of the author do not represent the opinions of Sitnews.

E-mail your letters & opinions to
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.

Published letters become the property of SitNews.

SitNews ©2018
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska

Articles & photographs that appear in SitNews may be protected by copyright and may not be reprinted without written permission from and payment of any required fees to the proper sources.

E-mail your news & photos to

Photographers choosing to submit photographs for publication to SitNews are in doing so granting their permission for publication and for archiving. SitNews does not sell photographs. All requests for purchasing a photograph will be emailed to the photographer.