Vote no on sales tax increase
by Samuel Bergeron
June 05, 2004
I support full funding for schools. I believe as does Mr. Landis
and others that economic development begins with a school system
that is funded and thriving. The measure of my success as a parent
and public official will be my ability to instill my children
and yours with the love of learning and the tools to be a success
as an adult.
The Borough talks about a fiscal crisis and Robert Warner says
we have a spending crisis. I say we have an allocation crisis.
With that said, I wish let you all know about a little known
tax called PILT. Payment in lieu of taxes.
Payment in lieu of taxes is paid from all the customers of Ketchikan
Public Utilities directly to the City of Ketchikan in the amount
of $600,000.00 every year. In addition to that, Ports and Harbors
pays PILT to the city as well in the amount of $150,000.00. I
wish to point out that both entities serve the entire Borough,
not just the City. What is happening here is the residents of
the Borough are paying a direct subsidy to the City. It is a
gross misallocation of Borough wide tax dollars. This money goes
directly into the general fund of the city and is mostly put
into their reserves (bank account) instead of funding schools
or perhaps fire and EMS for the Borough. This makes about as
much sense as the City paying homage to the Borough for no apparent
reason. The proposed sales tax increase will bring in less money
than the combined PILT payment from Ports and Harbors and KPU.
Here is a novel Idea; redirect PILT paid by both entities, (KPU
and Ports and Harbors) that are Borough wide, to fund schools
debt and insurance. No new taxes would be needed and it would
reallocate Borough wide funds to a Borough function saving all
of us, City and Borough residents, another superfluous tax.
Sales tax is charged to food and residential rent and by in large
is not tax deductible as is a property tax. It would also put
our merchants at a disadvantage to other cities in southeast
as some of their respective sales tax rates are lower. We would
lose sales to outside merchants with a lower tax base. Sales
tax is an unfair tax; it charges the same tax to the wealthiest
and to the poorest. I hate sales tax for that reason alone. The
wealthy seem to have an ability to buy where sales tax is not
charged and less the fortunate are stuck paying it because they
don t have access to these tax free locations. (Seattle for instance)
If we redirected PILT to fund school debt and insurance we could
also fund student activities. There would be no new taxes and
a gross misallocation of your tax dollars and mine would be well
spent funding our schools to the cap where it should be year
in and out. Would you Borough residents like to see your tax
dollars spent on schools or stashed away in the City's reserves?
You tell me and them. Vote no on the well intentioned but unnecessary
sales tax increase for schools. We need to pressure the City
to stop this outrage called PILT. E-mail and call your city officials
and ask them, is it more important to add to the already burgeoning
City bank account or hire enough teachers to educate our youth
and help make our schools worth going to? I vote the latter.
I believe stongly that Borough generated taxes should be spent
on Borough wide expenses like education, not going to the City's
Thanks for listening.
Ketchikan, AK - USA
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Post a Comment -------View Comments
Submit an Opinion - Letter
Stories In The News