Vote of confidence instead
by Samuel Bergeron
June 05, 2004
The recent effort by David Jensen, Elmer Makua, Carrie James
and Norman Arriolla to continue with the recall petition against
our duly elected president Stephanie Rainwater Sande is an exercise
The President of Ketchikan Indian Community is elected every
twelve months. So where is the logic or circumstance that would
warrant a recall petition and election? It doesn't exist. The
majority of David Jensen, Elmer Makua, Carrie James and Norman
Arriolla would have you believe that high crimes and misdemeanors
occur on a daily basis by our president and we can't just go
on like this anymore. Horse pooh.
Those of us who wish to get on with the business of the tribe
have been met with such stellar policy decisions by the majority
as the repeal of a clarifying ordinance for our hopelessly outdated
and obsolete ordinance 7. They suggest that following the exact
letter of ordinance 7, they're doing what is your best interest,
they're not. So they voted to repeal it with out offering up
another solution to as to how we do business in 2004.
We have serious issues in front of us: Decreases in funding,
regionalization, a joint venture in housing with Tlinghet &
Hiada and our never ending power struggle at the board, to name
a few. We need leaders that have a vision of where we want to
go and the ability to work with others. This group doesn't have
that. They have their own agenda of getting things their way
at all costs. The net result of this is a lost opportunity to
make your life and mine better. By spending our time trying to
remain in power and trying to get power, the organization suffers
The most serious issue in my mind that faces KIC is the elected
leadership that supposes to drop all business and focus on recalling
a president that is elected every twelve months. It is really
dim-witted. There is no loftier way to put it. I want you all
to know these people are hopelessly misguided and they just don't
get it. They don't get the fact that we have the opportunity
to be a leader in all of native politics, instead with this recall
effort, they've caused KIC's reputation and standing locally,
State-wide and nationally to be diminished.
What I would like to do is have a special vote of confidence
instead of this insipid recall effort. We should give the voters
an opportunity to vote to retain or recall any or all of us who
serve on the council. My guess would be that the present majority
would be sent packing.
There are those who would suggest that we should go back to the
old ways of doing our business behind closed doors. They long
for the days when all of you had no clue what was going on, what
the issues were and what your elected leaders did at the table.
If you look back at the history of our people, they embraced
every new technology available to them. Starting from iron tools
then going all the way with the internet today. When we kept
our business in house, we lived communally in a much different
society with a much smaller population.
Doing business behind closed doors takes away accountability
to your members. If they don't know what goes on and what the
issues are, how will they hold their elected leaders accountable?
I say this all the time: good government is open government.
We are a tribe of 5000 members. We really have no meaningful
method of communicating openly with our members excepting for
forums like this one. I will strive to give all of you my unbridled
opinion as to who is doing what and why.
Member: KIC Tribal Council
Ketchikan, AK - USA
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Post a Comment -------View Comments
Submit an Opinion - Letter
Stories In The News