SitNews - Stories in the News - Ketchikan, Alaska


RE: Dopey mushers
By Margery Glickman


May 14, 2010
Friday PM

Dear Letters Editor:

John Suter raised excellent points when he wrote: "The next thing that ITC does not have is drug testing transparency for the dogs on the trail. No one is allowed to see the drug test results. Why is that? How does any one know that the dogs are in fact drug tested?"

The Iditarod doesn't reveal where and when dogs are tested, or if every dog is tested during a race. Are dogs tested more than once? Are blood tests given after the Iditarod starts? Who maintains the integrity of the samples? What lab is used? Is it certified?

Iditarod Rule 39 lists the prohibited drugs and procedures that can't be utilized on dogs. According to Rule 51, violations may result in warnings, monetary penalties, time penalties, censure, withdrawals or disqualification. By using the word "may," the Iditarod hasn't committed itself to punishing violators. Notice that the violators are not banned from racing.

Margery Glickman
Sled Dog Action Coalition,
Miami, FL


Received May 12, 2010 - Published May 14, 2010


Related Viewpoint:

letterDopey Mushers By John Suter

Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:

letter Webmail Your Opinion Letter to the Editor



Note: Comments published on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.


E-mail your letters & opinions to
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.

SitNews ©2010
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska