|  State of Alaska to Sue Over
      Polar Bear Listing May 22, 2008Thursday
 Alaska Governor Sarah Palin announced Wednesday the state of
      Alaska intends to file suit in U.S. District Court for the District
      of Columbia challenging U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne's
      decision to list the polar bear as threatened under the Endangered
      Species Act.
 
 "We appreciate the Secretary's recognition that oil and
      gas activities are already regulated under the Marine Mammal
      Protection Act to prevent impacts to the polar bear and do not
      pose a threat to the polar bear," Governor Palin said.
 
 In previous comments submitted to the Secretary, the state maintains
      that there is insufficient evidence to support a listing of the
      polar bear as threatened for any reason at this time.  Polar
      bears are currently well-managed and have dramatically increased
      over 30 years as a result of conservation measures enacted through
      international agreements and the Marine Mammal Protection Act.
       A listing of the polar bear under the ESA will not provide additional
      conservation measures.
 
 The Attorney General's office will draft and file a complaint
      under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  The Secretary's
      decision to list a currently healthy species is based on not
      only the uncertain modeling of future climate change, but also
      the unproven long-term impact of any future climate change on
      the species.  Alaska's Attorney General believes the decision
      is so arbitrary it violates the limits of the APA.
 
 The Attorney General's office will also begin drafting a 60-day
      notice of intent to sue under the Endangered Species Act. This
      action is based on the Secretary's failure to make a decision
      based solely on the best available scientific and commercial
      information. It is also based on the Secretary's unwarranted
      expansion of the "foreseeable future" into periods
      where detailed forecasts of climate change are not possible.
       A 60-day notice is a legal prerequisite to bringing an action
      directly under the ESA.
 
 The state is also monitoring ongoing litigation related to the
      polar bear listing in the Northern District of California and
      will consider intervention in that lawsuit if it becomes clear
      that the court in that case intends to address substantive rather
      than just procedural issues.
 
 "While climate change is a significant issue, the Endangered
      Species Act is not the right tool to address impacts to a species
      from climate change," Attorney General Talis Colberg said.
 
 "Inappropriate implementation of this listing decision could
      result in widespread social and economic impacts, including increased
      power costs and further increases in fuel prices, without providing
      any more protection for the species," Department of Natural
      Resources Commissioner Tom Irwin said.
 
 "While the state is challenging the listing, we remain committed
      to assuring Alaska's polar bears are conserved," Governor
      Palin said.  "The state will continue to monitor Alaska's
      polar bear populations and their behaviors in relation to changing
      sea ice conditions."
 
   Source of News: 
        E-mail your news &
      photos to editor@sitnews.usOffice of the Governorwww.gov.state.ak.us
 
 
 
 Publish A Letter in SitNews         Read Letters/Opinions
      Contact the Editor
 
        SitNews
        ©2008Stories In The News
 Ketchikan, Alaska
 |