US labor force: Destined to
benefits of a third world economy?
by R.K. Rice
April 23, 2005
Today's attack on the benefits of the working people of the United
States is the beginning of changes to gut the Family Leave Act.
This benefit was invaluable to me and my family when we had a
medical crisis, as I know it has been to countless other Americans
over the years. Everyday there is something new out of Washington
D.C. that degrades the pay, benefits, retirement or working conditions
of the average American.
Now, we have a move afoot to
stop the system of Democracy from impeding the appointments of
Judges who agree with the assault on the American peoples' rights.
Congress is going to try and stop the filibuster from being used
as a legitimate tool to give the minority party a way to temper
the majority party from imposing its will on the people of America.
Almost all of these changes
are aimed at ultimately shifting as much wealth and power to
the wealthy privileged elite. Wake UP! If America keeps blindly
voting Republican, instead of for the candidate based on their
ideas, we will soon have a labor force with the rights and benefits
of a third world economy.
Ketchikan, AK - USA
Some Related News Stories:
over proposed changes to Family and Medical Leave Act By MARY DEIBEL - Patti Phillips didn't
have to choose between work and family when her 12-year-old daughter
was diagnosed with bone cancer. - More...
Friday - April 22, 2005
judges get Senate committee approval By MARGARET TALEV -
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday implored
colleagues on both sides of the aisle to "transcend party
loyalty in the national interest" after his panel moved
two of President Bush's controversial judicial nominees to the
full Senate for heated confirmation proceedings that could provoke
a constitutional crisis over filibusters.- More...
Friday - April 22, 2005
look at the Senate filibuster By BILL STRAUB - Senate Republican
leader Bill Frist of Tennessee is thinking about invoking the
"nuclear option" - a change in Senate rules that would
prohibit Democrats from staging filibusters in opposition to
President Bush's judicial appointments. Here is a quick look
at the issue: -
Saturday - April 16, 2005
option' holds peril for both sides in Senate by Margaret
Talev - Given U.S. tensions with Iran and North Korea, "nuclear
option" might not have been Republicans' most diplomatic
choice of a nickname for the procedure they're considering unleashing
on Capitol Hill next month. In fact, many are cringing at the
moniker, preferring the phrase "constitutional option."
Tuesday - March 08, 2005
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Write a Letter -------Read Letters
E-mail the Editor
Stories In The News