|  Viewpoints
      Re: Southeast Economy and
      S.881 By Evan Hjerpe
 WednesdayMarch 31, 2010
 Senator Murkowski's letter to the editor in the SitNews on 3/24/10
      ( Southeast's Economy and Promises ) states that the Sealaska
      legislation would bring  renewed economic development  to Southeast
      and is needed for the  economic survival of the region.   A single-interest
      bill that is based on the liquidation of old growth and exporting
      processing jobs overseas is by no means the answer to the regional
      economic woes of Southeast; this perspective has been echoed
      during the recent listening sessions in the region.  In fact,
      letting Sealaska harvest these lands represents a costly option
      in terms of adverse impacts on subsistence opportunities and
      the regional economic drivers the Senator alludes to of tourism,
      fishing, and trade.
 
 S.881 would take much of the most productive old growth and second
      growth acreage out of the national forest, limiting the  regional
       ecological and economic opportunities associated with these
      valuable watersheds.  A 2005 McDowell report prepared for Sealaska
      illustrates that the direct timber jobs (Full-Time Equivalents)
      associated with Sealaska harvests are approximately half of those
      associated with Tongass National Forest harvests.  Converting
      McDowell s job estimates to Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) shows
      that Sealaska generates 2.5 FTE jobs per million board feet of
      harvest, while Tongass National Forest harvests generate 4.4
      FTE jobs per million board feet of harvest.  Additionally, due
      to stricter standards and guidelines, watersheds managed by the
      Forest Service spur more forest management and planning jobs
      than management of private forests.  These Forest Service jobs
      are extremely important to rural Southeast communities, as they
      are year-round and pay livable wages. Decreases in the amount
      of public lands in Southeast will be accompanied by decreased
      public investments.
 
 We do not dispute Sealaska's right to their ANCSA entitlements,
      but offering the Sealaska legislation as a panacea to the problems
      facing the Southeast regional economy is a red herring.  S.881
      will provide beneficial revenue to Sealaska Corporation, their
      subsidiaries, and their shareholders.  The  regional  economic
      impact, however, will be limited and could be much greater. 
      The productive watersheds on Prince of Wales Island under selection
      represent some of the most valuable areas on the Tongass for
      connectivity, fish production, wildlife habitat, and wood supply.
       As a wood basket, these watersheds should be part of a local
      production chain.  For fish and wildlife connectivity, these
      watersheds should be part of a network of reserves across the
      Tongass that can provide both beneficial ecological and economic
      impacts.  Dealing with the economic values of these watersheds
      in isolation minimizes their potential aggregate impact.
 
 If social gridlock is limiting economic development on the public
      forest, let s find economic activities that receive greater social
      acceptability.  One such method for increasing social acceptability
      would be a transition out of old growth clearcutting and into
      a robust restoration and stewardship program on our public lands.
       Such a transition could provide significant investments into
      our natural capital base, more jobs than traditional timber production,
      and a small-scale wood products industry.  With a willing Administration
      that supports rural economic development and sustainable forest
      management, the time is ripe for Senator Murkowski and the Alaska
      delegation to be spearheading a truly inclusive, collaborative
      solution that can put people back to work in the woods, conserve
      high value watersheds, and fulfill Sealaska s entitlements. 
      As it stands now, S.881 is not the answer to southeast Alaska
      s economic problems.
 
 Evan Hjerpe, Ph.D.
 Anchorage, AK
 
 About: "Resource Economist,
      The Wilderness Society, Alaska Regional Office" Received March , 2009 - Published
      March 31, 2010   Related Viewpoint: 
         Southeast's
        Economy and Promises By U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski
 Viewpoints - Opinion Letters: 
         Webmail
        Your Opinion Letter to the Editor
    Note: Comments published
      on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
       
      E-mail your letters
      & opinions to editor@sitnews.us
 Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.
 
 
 
        SitNews
        ©2010Stories In The News
 Ketchikan, Alaska
 |