SitNews - Stories in the News - Ketchikan, Alaska


"Yes" on April 3rd
By Rep. John Coghill


March 30, 2007

The Constitution of the State of Alaska clearly states that "all political power is inherent in the people." In October of last year, The Alaska Supreme Court ruled in favor of granting employee benefits to same-sex couples, in effect undermining this Constitutional provision and establishing its own will as having precedent over the will of the people of Alaska.

By deliberately ignoring the clear message sent by Alaskan voters in 1998 when they overwhelming amended the Constitution to read that "a marriage may only exist between a man and a woman," the Supreme Court overstepped its bounds. The key to correcting this misdeed and reestablishing the constitutionally guaranteed series of checks-and-balances is the April 3rd Advisory Vote on Same Sex Benefits.

In a few weeks, the people of Alaska need to once again remind the Legislature that we will not tolerate judges legislating from the bench. A "Yes" vote on the April ballot will give legislators the extra push needed in order to again amend the constitution.

Some objections to the vote are based on three different ideas:

  • The advisory vote is estimated to cost one million dollars; the legislature can find a better purpose for the money.

The Supreme Court has ordered Alaskans to pay for a benefit that the majority of people disagree with philosophically. Once the state requires same-sex benefits for partners of state employees, it is only a few more legal steps until private businesses are forced to provide the same benefits lest they "discriminate". Such a broad-reaching policy decision deserves to be openly debated in a broad public venue - that debate costs money. I believe there is no better way for Alaska's money to be spent than by furthering the will of the people.

  • Objection to same-sex benefits is a result of religious bigotry.

The issue at hand is not the morality of homosexuality, but rather the court's deliberate misinterpretation of the will of the people of Alaska. The people voted that same sex unions are not the same as a marriage. Married couples commit to each other for life, and with that level of commitment, the state recognizes the married couple's right to benefits for spouses. The Court set no mandates for proof of commitment other than a state employee's designation on a form.

  • A special election will weary already skeptical voters.

Weariness is not an excuse for apathy. I am weary after every session, but the people elect me to support and defend the Constitution, and fighting for this advisory vote does exactly that. I am looking to the people of Alaska to once again cast a vote in defense of marriage and reclaim the rights usurped by the Supreme Court.

If Alaskans allow this decision to pass without objection, we will be setting a precedent that allows the Supreme Court to disregard the will of the people of Alaska.

About: Rep. John Coghill is a member of the Alaska Legislature representing House District 11- North Pole.



Note: Comments published on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.


Send A Letter -------Read Letters

E-mail the Editor at

Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska