Viewpoints
Re: IT errors at PFD
By Glen Thompson
March 24, 2007
Saturday
It is apparent from the description of the event that except
for the hard errors, the problems resulted from human error.
It also appears that the procedures were adequately changed to
prevent a repeat performance... My only question is why weren't
all the LUNs backed up before rebinding? The manual/partial backup
of the raid partitions when the virtual drives could not be specifically
mapped to the LUNs should have indicated the need for a full
database backup prior to the rebind (or any component replacement
of the raid).
Yea, I been there... Live and learn.
Best,
Glen Thompson
Ketchikan, AK
Received March 23, 2007 - Published March 24, 2007
About: "Local business
owner, politician, and gadfly but also perhaps one of the few
who actually understood the article having spent too many years
behind a keyboard and digging thru the guts of computer systems?
"
Related Letter:
 An
accurate, technical explanation of the PFD data loss By Norm
Snyder
Note: Comments published
on Viewpoints are the opinions of the writer
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sitnews.
Send A Letter -------Read
Letters
E-mail the Editor at
editor@sitnews.us
Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska
|