SitNews - Stories in the News - Ketchikan, Alaska

Viewpoints: Letters / Opinions

Not an Expenditure!

By Ghert Abbott

February 28, 2019
Thursday PM

Like many Ketchikan residents, I appreciate that Representative Ortiz took the time to inform us on February 13th about the Governor’s slash & burn budget.

Unfortunately, Ortiz’s analysis was marred by a serious ideological mischaracterization of the PFD.

Our Representative wrote: “Dividends are the largest expenditure in our state budget.” The dividend is not a state expenditure and should not be framed as such. Rather, the money taken from the PFD and the Permanent Fund’s Earning Reserve should be considered tax revenue.

This is not a matter of mere semantics; there are real consequences in such definitions and framing. If the dividend is just another expenditure, then that means all of the Permanent Fund belongs to the state government, not individual Alaskans, and the dividend is just another state welfare program. If the PFD is an expenditure, than the deficit is principally caused by the PFD, as opposed to the state government’s ongoing failure to raise oil taxes and implement an income tax. If the PFD is a government expenditure rather than tax revenue, than confiscating money from the dividend is a state cutback rather than a state tax. And if it’s not a tax, then the politicians don’t have to take responsibility for regressively taxing you.

The petroleum resources of Alaska are publically owned – that means they belong to every Alaskan. The money deriving from the sale of this oil therefore belongs to each and every Alaskan. A portion goes to the state government to pay for its public services, while the rest is given to the Permanent Fund Corporation to invest in the financial markets. These investments in turn generate a return; a portion of this return is sent out in the form of dividends to individual Alaskans, while the rest is reinvested to preserve and grow the Fund. The PFDs are therefore your individual income from the natural resource wealth we collectively own.

Back in August, Representative Ortiz pledged to protect “the People’s Permanent Fund Dividends,” explicitly recognizing that the PFD belongs to the Alaskan people. It’s therefore disappointing to see him seemingly backsliding, using establishment language that could easily justify the total elimination of the Permanent Fund Dividend. Words don’t just describe reality, they also affect and even create it.

Ghert Abbott
Ketchikan, Alaska

About: Ghert Abbott was born in Ketchikan in 1986 and is a graduate of Ketchikan High School and the University of Alaska Southeast-Ketchikan.



Editor's Note:

The text of this letter was NOT edited by the SitNews Editor.


Received February 26, 2019 - Published February 28, 2019

Related Viewpoint:



Viewpoints - Opinion Letters:

Webmail Your Opinion Letter to the Editor


E-mail your letters & opinions to
Your full name, city and state are required for letter publication.

Published letters become the property of SitNews.

SitNews ©2019
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska

Articles & photographs that appear in SitNews are considered protected by copyright and may not be reprinted without written permission from and payment of any required fees to the proper sources.

E-mail your news & photos to

Photographers choosing to submit photographs for publication to SitNews are in doing so granting their permission for publication and for archiving. SitNews does not sell photographs. All requests for purchasing a photograph will be emailed to the photographer.