SitNews - Stories in the News - Ketchikan, Alaska

 

Fur flies over bear hunt
By ALEX deMARBAN
Anchorage Daily News

 

February 23, 2007
Friday AM


ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- Flooded with critical e-mails and letters, Alaska fish and game officials want the state's Board of Game to undo its recent decision allowing bear hunts near one of the world's premier bear-viewing areas.

The staff recommendation says bear numbers near the McNeil River State Game Sanctuary are healthy and won't be jeopardized by the first hunt in 22 years.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

But letting hunters kill a few bears on land south and east of the sanctuary - as close as 10 miles from bear-busy McNeil River Falls - could tarnish the image of hunting in Alaska, said Matt Robus, state wildlife conservation director.

"It does not seem to be a good trade to make," Robus said.

Bear viewing has grown significantly on the upper Alaska Peninsula, with tourists flocking to the sanctuary and other nearby areas to photograph bears as they snatch fish from rivers and loll in grass.

Department of Fish and Game staffers opposed the bear hunt two years ago - citing the same reasons they do now - but the Game Board voted to allow the hunt then, Robus said.

The first hunt is scheduled for October, unless the board overturns its decision at a meeting March 2-12 in Anchorage. Board Chairman Ron Somerville wouldn't predict how the board will vote.

More than 8,200 brown bears prowl the peninsula, according to Fish and Game officials. Hunters killed about 335 brown bears there between 2001 and 2005. Bear harvests increased in the last couple of years on federal land west of the sanctuary.

On the state land near the sanctuary, no more than five bear-hunt permits will be allowed every two years to keep the bear numbers sustainable, under the Game Board decision.

Fish and Game Department employees have received a steady stream of letters since last fall, about a dozen a week, Robus said.

None of the comments favors a bear hunt, he said.

Bears that wander just feet from cameras in the sanctuary and other areas have become popular with viewers, some even earning nicknames.

Critics of the plan fear those bears will be shot, hurting the bear-viewing industry, he said. They also question hunting ethics that would allow hunters to blast bears that have become somewhat accustomed to humans.

Many of the writers say they're hunters, said Robus.

The hunt would take place outside the sanctuary on 95,000 acres of state-owned land. Bears there and elsewhere on the upper Alaska Peninsula can range across a large area that includes the sanctuary, as well as Lake Clark and Katmai national parks.

Bear numbers at the McNeil River Falls have fallen in recent years, with only 78 stopping there in 2004, barely half the number from 1997. Some blame the increased bear harvests. Others say the bears have moved to other rivers with stronger salmon runs.

Rod Arno, head of the pro-hunting Alaska Outdoor Council, said he's disturbed that the department bowed to public pressure in its recommendation. It should have based its advice on the fact that bear numbers can support a hunt and still be sustainable.

 

Anchorage Daily News reporter Alex deMarban can be reached at ademarban@adn.com
Distributed to subscribers for publication by
Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com


Publish A Letter on SitNews
        Read Letters/Opinions

Contact the Editor

SitNews ©2006
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska