Sitnews - Stories In The News - Ketchikan, Alaska - Opinions

 

Administration Bill Would Exclude Senior Management and Confidential Employees from Collective Bargaining

February 25, 2004
Wednesday - 1:15 am


The Murkowski administration has introduced legislation that would exclude some high level, senior management and confidential positions from collective bargaining with union representation. The reason to exclude the state employees is that allowing them to bargain creates a conflict of interest that can benefit the employees personally, at the public's expense. No other state allows confidential employees to bargain, and very few allow managers to bargain. Private businesses do not allow confidential or managerial employees to bargain.

"Our objective is to bring Alaska's public employee bargaining laws into conformity with those of other states and with federal law," said Commissioner of Administration Mike Miller. "We think it is entirely appropriate that an employee who moves up the ladder and takes a job as a senior manager will be paid commensurate with that new responsibility, but should no longer be covered by a union. We are especially concerned that people we, as a state, hire to conduct our confidential bargaining for the public with the public employees' unions, should not also be members of those unions. That is extremely bad public policy and creates an undeniable conflict of interest."

The bills create a career service classified management level position, below the level of political appointees. This new position will give the state a more professional management system and contribute to continuity in carrying out public policy from one administration to the next.

Alaska was one of the first states to allow public employees to collectively bargain when it adopted the Alaska Public Employment Relations Act (PERA) in 1972. One of the major differences between the National Labor Relations Act and PERA is that confidential, managerial, and supervisory employees are not allowed under the national act to be members of unions because it creates a conflict of interest to have them bargaining for the employer as union members. At the bargaining table, the state's agents or representatives must be loyal to the state, not to the unions with which they are bargaining.

The legislation (HB 518 and SB 352) would remove confidential and managerial employees from PERA's definition of "public employee." Language in the bills that creates the exclusions is taken largely from federal law, and is based on private sector case law.

 

Source of News Release:

Office of the Governor
Web Site


 

E-mail your news & photos to editor@sitnews.org


Post a Comment
        View Comments
Submit an Opinion - Letter

Sitnews
Stories In The News
Ketchikan, Alaska